MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2470972579 · doi:10.1503/cjs.005416

Continuous quality improvement in orthopedic surgery: changes and implications with health system funding reform

2016· editorial· en· W2470972579 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Paul E. Beaulé, Darren M. Roffey, Stéphane Poitras

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Surgery · 2016
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalCanadian Physiotherapy AssociationUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOrthopedic surgeryLiberian dollarHealth careQuality managementQuality (philosophy)Healthcare systemEmergency medicineMedical emergencyFinanceOperations managementSurgeryEconomic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Total health expenditure was expected to reach $219.1 billion or $6105 per Canadian in 2015,[1][1] with orthopedic care accounting for approximately 12% of total hospital acute care costs.[2][2] In 2012–13, providing health care in Ontario consumed 42 cents of every tax dollar. Without

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.399
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of SurgerySame topicCardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical OutcomesFrench-language works237,207