MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2470975651

Prescription médicamenteuse inappropriée : les nouveaux critères STOPP/START

2015· article· fr· W2470975651 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pierre Olivier Lang, Benoît Boland, Olivia Dalleur

Bibliographic record

VenueDIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedical prescriptionPolitical scienceHumanitiesMedicinePhilosophyNursing
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La prescription médicamenteuse inappropriée (PMI) est un problème majeur de santé publique. Elle est associée à une augmentation de la morbi-mortalité et de la consommation des ressources de santé et ce principalement en raison de la survenue d’effets indésirables (EI). La révision systématique des prescriptions médicamenteuses est apparue depuis longtemps comme une solution pour limiter les PMI et les EI directement associés. Dans cet objectif, depuis 2008, la liste des critères STOPP/START est apparue comme un outil séduisant, logique, et facile d’utilisation.Cette version initiale vient d’être mise à jour. Après avoir détaillé les changements apportés, nous présentons le résultat de son adaptation en langue française par un groupe d’experts francophones belges, canadiens, français et suisses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.917
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.161
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDIAL (Catholic University of Leuven)Same topicPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesFrench-language works237,207