MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2471108883 · doi:10.31026/j.eng.2010.02.10

FLOW SEPARATION OF AXIAL COMPRESSOR CASCADE BLADES

2010· article· en· W2471108883 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Engineering · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTurbomachinery Performance and Optimization
Canadian institutionsCascades (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCascadeAxial compressorSeparation (statistics)Gas compressorFlow (mathematics)MechanicsMaterials scienceComputer scienceMechanical engineeringPhysicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An experimental and theoretical investigation of the effect of flow separation on the performanceof a cascade NACA 65_(12)10 axial compressor blade has been carried out. The experimental workincludes the fabrication of three blades from wood, each having a chord (100mm) but one of these blades having a span of (90mm) for smoke tunnel testing and the other two blades having a span of (380mm) for wind tunnel testing.The two blades were connected by suitable mechanism in order to be fixed in the wind tunnel protractor and rotated in the required stagger angle. The cascade was tested in an open type low-speed subsonic (Mach number=0.117) wind tunnel, for Reynolds number (Re=239605) based on maximum velocity (35 m/s) and airfoil chord length. The total and static pressures were measured in selected points between the two blades for stagger angles of (4 0 , 0 0 ,- 4 0 ,-8 0 and -120) by using a multi-tube manometer and a pitot static tube. The small blade (90mm span) is tested in the smoke tunnel to visualize the real behavior of flow separation. The theoretical work includes using the software FLUENT (V6.2) to simulate the flow between the two blades. The study shows that the flow separation begins when the cascade are inclined at a stagger angle of (- 4 0 ) on the suction side of the lower blade at a position (96%chord experimentally and 98%chord theoretically). Then, the separation zone increases with increased stagger angle (in clockwise direction) and reach to the position (61%chord experimentally and 63%chord theoretically) at a stagger angle (-12 0 ).These results are validated by a smoke tunnel tests.This separation affects the performance of the compressor, where the static pressure ratio ( Sep /Sip ) decreases as the separation zone gets bigger. The range of working stagger angle is then calculated. It was found in the range (-18 0 to 36 0 ). The flow behavior between the two blades shows that the blade-to-blade configuration works as nozzle-diffuser. The theoretical results were compared with the experimental results and good agreement was obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.300

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it