High Risk Apml Treated Successfully with Four Cycles of ATO and ATRA Combination in Resource Constrained Settings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background: Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APML) is amongst the most curable malignancies with survival close to 80% [1]. Combination of all-trans- retinoic-acid (ATRA) and anthracyclines is the current standard of care for high-risk APML patients [2]. Literature on combination of arsenic trioxide (ATO) with ATRA in high risk APML, the number of cycles and long-term toxicity of ATO is scarce [3]. Methods: It is a single center retrospective study. Diagnosis of APML was made by bone marrow (BM) and PML-RARα detection by RT PCR. Patients with high risk APML (defined as TLC>10000/µL) enrolled after 2006 were included and treated with combination of ATO/ATRA as per the protocol (Fig. 1). RT PCR for PML-RARα was done after remission induction, completion of consolidation and 6 monthly thereafter. Results: A total of 39 high risk APML patients were treated during the study period (25 males, 14 females) with median age 31y (range 15-50). Cohort was poorly educated (median - 10th standard) and were from poor socioeconomic strata (mean monthly income - INR 7000, 1USD=65INR). The major presenting complaints were bleeding manifestation and fever (78%, 84% respectively) for a median duration of 30 days (range 3-90d, 95% CI - 14.8). Baseline clinical, hematological and coagulation parameters are as enumerated in Table1.Table 1.Descriptive statistics high risk APML patients at baselineMinimumMaximumMeanStd. DeviationHeight (cm)148180163.109.91Weight (kg)35.080.055.4711.75Peripheral blood smear features at presentationHemoglobin (g/dL)4.113.37.132.36Leucocyte count (/µL)107001237004597635230.92Platelet ( x 109/L)625528944.76Blasts and Promyelocytes (%)010070.8535.57Bone marrow findings at diagnosisBlasts09417.5827.43Promyelocytes29670.2423.14Coagulation parameters at presentationPT (s)113120.104.22aPTT (s)203327.793.34Fibrinogen (g/L)0.683.841.890.81 Complications: DIC was present in 66.7% of the patient at baseline with the median duration to resolution of DIC on ATO/ATRA being 7 days (range 4 - 25d). Thrombosis was present in 17.1% of the patients. Differentiation syndrome (DS) was seen in 59% (n-23) of the patients at mean duration of 5.6 days of starting therapy (range: -4 to 14d). Twenty one percent of patients with DS (n-5) succumbed to death and all these patients had features of spontaneous DS prior to starting ATO/ATRA. Deaths due to differentiation were primarily seen in during the first week of starting therapy (median-D4). In rest all cases DS improved with dexamethasone 10mg BD and interruption of ATO/ATRA. Outcomes: Median duration to hematological remission was 31days (range: 2-59d). Bone marrow remission was attained in all patients alive at the end of induction. Molecular remission was attained in 100% of these patients. OS was 84.1% (Fig 2A). Log survival curve (Fig 2B) elucidates the fact that those patients who survived the induction therapy had no mortality further during the course of illness. Event free survival (EFS) was 84.1%, same as OS suggesting no patients relapsed during the therapy. Mean follow up of the cohort was 910 days (range 1 - 2681d, SD - 854.3d). Long term follow up these patients showed no evidence of secondary malignancy as feared by most authors for giving ATO therapy. Conclusions: Four cycles of ATRA/ATO with two years of maintenance therapy produces long-term remission with low risk of relapse and no arsenic induced long term toxicities in patients with high risk APML. REFERENCES: 1. Sanz MA, Lo-Coco F. Modern approaches to treating acute promyelocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:495-503. 2. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (nccn). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Ver. 2.2013. Fort Washington, PA: nccn; 2013. 3. Seftel MD, Barnett MJ, Couban S, Leber B, Storring J, Assaily W, Fuerth B, Christofides A, Schuh AC. A Canadian consensus on the management of newly diagnosed and relapsed acute promyelocytic leukemia in adults. Curr Oncol. 2014 Oct;21(5):234-50. Figure 1. Protocol of ATO/ATRA therapy. Legend: BM - Bone marrow, Consol - Consolidation, PCR - Polymerase chain reaction, DIC - disseminated intravascular coagulation, ANC - absolute neutrophil count, Wk - week, OD - once daily. Figure 1. Protocol of ATO/ATRA therapy. Legend: BM - Bone marrow, Consol - Consolidation, PCR - Polymerase chain reaction, DIC - disseminated intravascular coagulation, ANC - absolute neutrophil count, Wk - week, OD - once daily. Figure 2. Kaplan Meier curves (A) Cumulative survival curve showing 84% OS. (B) log survival curve showing no mortality after the initial 90 days after starting therapy. Figure 2. Kaplan Meier curves (A) Cumulative survival curve showing 84% OS. (B) log survival curve showing no mortality after the initial 90 days after starting therapy. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".