MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Severe Toxicities During Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia Chemotherapy: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group.

2010· article· en· W2471444531 on OpenAlexaff
Lillian Sung, Richard Aplenc, Todd A. Alonzo, Robert B. Gerbing, Soheil Meshinchi, Laura Burden, Susana C. Raimondi, Betsy Hirsch, Samir B. Kahwash, Amy Heerema‐McKenney, Laura Winter, Kathleen Glick, Patti Byron, Tanya Wallas, Franklin O. Smith, Alan S. Gamis

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Canadian institutionsBC Children's HospitalHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCytarabineInternal medicineNeutropeniaGemtuzumab ozogamicinMitoxantroneEtoposideCommon Terminology Criteria for Adverse EventsChemotherapyRegimenChemotherapy regimenFebrile neutropeniaAdverse effectOncologyGastroenterologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 1071 Background: Treatment of children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with considerable toxicity. Children's Oncology Group (COG) AAML0531 trial adopted a modified AML Medical Research Council backbone and reviewed adverse event reports in real time to maximize accurate toxicity data. As of March 31, 2010, AAML0531 had randomized 968 patients with de novo AML to gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GMTZ) versus no GMTZ. Accurate description of toxicities with the backbone regimen as well as increment toxicities of new agents is important to optimize supportive care. Objectives were to describe hepatic, cardiac and infectious toxicities and duration of neutropenia in all patients, and to compare toxicities between treatment arms. Methods: AAML0531 included those ≥ 1 month to ≤ 30 years with de novo AML and used a 5 cycle chemotherapy regimen: Induction (Ind) I and II: cytarabine, daunorubicin, and etoposide (ADE 10+3+5 and 8+3+5); Intensification (Int) I: cytarabine and etoposide; Int II: mitoxantrone and high-dose cytarabine; and Int III: high-dose cytarabine and L'asparaginase. Subjects were randomized to receive or not receive GMTZ 3 mg/m2 during Ind I and Int II. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v3.0 toxicities were collected prospectively. Hepatic (ALT, bilirubin and veno-occlusive disease (VOD)), cardiac (left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD)) and infection (sterile site bacterial and fungal) toxicities were targeted. All grades of cardiac and VOD toxicities were captured; all other severe (≥ grade 3) toxicities were recorded. Cumulative incidence (CI) of toxicities was calculated only during protocol chemotherapy. Duration of neutropenia was reported from beginning of cycle to absolute neutrophil recovery ≥ 500/uL for patients alive during the cycle. Results: Table describes the prevalence of severe (≥ grade 3) toxicities and illustrates that severe high ALT occurred in 3–10%, high bilirubin was less common and VOD was reported in ≤ 1% of cycles. Severe LVSD also was rare although compliance with suggested cardiac monitoring ranged from 50–80% per course of treatment. In terms of grade 1 or 2 LSVD there were no differences in any course except for Int II where grade 1 or 2 LVSD was higher with GMTZ (8.0% versus 2.4%; P<.05). Severe sterile bacterial infections were very common occurring in about 30% during Ind I and II, 45% during Int I and 60% during Int II and III. The eight month CI of severe high ALT was 19±4%, hyperbilirubinemia was 10±3%, and VOD was 1±1%. CI of severe elevations in ALT were near significantly more common with GMTZ (22±5% versus 16±5%, P=0.053). Severe LVSD CI was 4±2%, sterile site bacterial infection CI was 82±4% and sterile site microbiologically documented fungal infections CI was 14±3%. CI of severe hyperbilirubinemia, VOD, LVSD and infections were not significantly different with GMTZ. The median (range) duration of neutropenia of Ind I and II in the no GMTZ arm were 30 (3-75) and 28 (1-61) days while for Int I, II and III were 27 (1-53), 37 (6-92) and 39 (16-91) days respectively. Administration of GMTZ did not significantly prolong neutropenia. There was no difference in toxic mortality by GMTZ during Ind I or across all courses of chemotherapy. Conclusions: The COG AML0531 backbone regimen is associated with significant toxicities: 19% of patients have severe elevations in ALT and 10% have severe hyperbilirubinemia. VOD is rare and occurs in 1%. Sterile site invasive infections are very common, particularly during high dose cytarabine. Sterile site microbiologically documented fungal infections occurs in 14% in spite of current supportive care practices. GMTZ contributes to increased high ALT and more grade 1 or 2 LVSD, both of which are of questionable clinical significance. Understanding these toxicities is important as this backbone will be carried into future studies of AML. Decreasing both bacterial and fungal infections will be important supportive care initiatives. Disclosures: Smith: Pfizer, Inc: Member, Medical Advisory Committee (for bosutinib, not GO).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBloodSame topicAcute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchFrench-language works237,207