MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Corrosion Behaviour of Alloy 800H in Low Density Superheated Steam

2016· article· en· W2471633330 on OpenAlex
Suzan Bsat, Xiao Huang

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueISIJ International · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSubcritical and Supercritical Water Processes
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersOffice of Energy Research and DevelopmentNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNatural Resources CanadaAtomic Energy of Canada Limited
KeywordsChromiaCorrosionMetallurgySpinelAlloySuperheated steamMaterials scienceHematiteOxideSupercritical fluidSuperheatingChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The integrity of materials is of great concern in the construction of nuclear reactors. During the design of Gen IV supercritical water reactors, materials characterization under simulated conditions must be carried out to aid proper material selection. In this study, the long term corrosion resistance of Alloy 800H under low pressure superheated steam (SHS) at a temperature of 800°C and 0.1 MPa was tested for up to 3000 hours. The results showed that all six samples experienced weight gain in the first 2000 hours while both weight gain and weight loss were found after 3000 hours. Visual inspection and SEM surface analysis suggest the likelihood of oxide exfoliation at a later stage of the testing in SHS. Additionally, chromia formed on all samples after 1000, 2000 and 3000 hours as well as spinel and hematite.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.184
Threshold uncertainty score0.586

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it