XV Международная Бахтинская конференция (Стокгольм, 23-27 июля 2014 г. )
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article represents a review of recent international conference devoted to comprehensive studying of M. M. Bakhtin's biography, creativity and scientists of Bakhtin Circle (V. N. Voloshinov, P. N. Medvedev etc.). About 200 scientists from Russia, Byelorussia, Ukraine, Poland, Slovenia, Germany, Italy, Finland, Great Britain, Israel, Canada, USA, Mexico, Brazil, China, India, Japan and other countries attended Stockholm conference (literary critics, linguists, philosophers, culturologists, psychologists, translators). During 5 days plenary reports (C. Emerson, A. Ponzio, G. Tihanov etc.) were heard; sessions of several panels, round tables have taken place; bright art presentations of the plots connected with bakhtinology and the modern art were held. The greatest interest of international audience was caused by discussion on completed multivolume Bakhtin's Collected and analysis of an intellectual phenomenon of Bakhtin Circle in the works of deceased researcher J. P. Medvedev. Conference took place in the walls of the Royal Institute of Art.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.041 | 0.019 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".