Random Field Representation of Horizontal Density Distribution in Partially Oriented Strandboard Mat
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A random field representation of the horizontal density distribution in partially oriented strandboard mats was investigated.The orientation of strands can be characterized by both the von Mises distribution and the uniform distribution within a range of angles.Theoretical models of the correlation coefficients of any two points simultaneously covered by one strand, characteristic area of the correlation, and the degree of orientation were developed.Results indicate that the concentration factor k = 700 is sufficiently large to represent a perfc:ctly aligned strand arrangement in oriented strandboards based on the von Mises distribution.The correlation coefficients of two points in a mat have a lower bound (random case) and an upper bound (perfectly aligned) in both von Mises and uniform distributions.Based on the concept of characteristic area, where the minimum characteristic area is the area of the strand and the maximum characteristic: area is approximate to the square of strand length, the degree of orientation in a panel can be represented as a function of characteristic area.This value is found to be very close to the percent alignment definition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it