MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2472261279 · doi:10.1021/bk-2009-1019.ch003

Model Cellulose I Surfaces: A Review

2009· review· en· W2472261279 on OpenAlexaff
Emily D. Cranston, Derek G. Gray

Bibliographic record

VenueACS symposium series · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvanced Cellulose Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCelluloseAdsorptionChemical engineeringMaterials scienceAqueous solutionColloidAmorphous solidDeposition (geology)SolventCoatingPolymer chemistryPolymer scienceChemistryNanotechnologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Past work on model cellulose surfaces has most often used cellulose II or amorphous cellulose regenerated from solvents; natural cellulose I surfaces are generally rough and intractable. However, smooth cellulose I surfaces can be prepared using an aqueous colloidal suspension of cellulose I nanocrystals with suitable substrates. We review a number of ways to make flat, uniform films by solvent-casting, spin-coating, electrostatic adsorption, and Langmuir-Blodgett deposition. The methods to make cellulose I films with internal structure and surface orientation are compared and some applications of these model surfaces are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.895
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS symposium seriesSame topicAdvanced Cellulose Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207