MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2472510939

The Mother/Infant, Analyst/Analysand Pair: Moving from Theoretical Constructs to Moments of Not Knowing

2015· article· en· W2472510939 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mercedes Muhlegg

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian journal of psychoanalysis · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnalogyPsychologyRelevance (law)Object (grammar)Container (type theory)Developmental psychologyPsychoanalysisEpistemologyPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When I learned about infant observation as a required component of analytictraining, I thought about prominent object-relations frameworks thathave developed since Freud's structural theories. An emphasis on the primacyof the early mother-infant relationship meant that we could obtainexperiential knowledge about the development of the infant from soon after birth, through the first year of its life. I thought about the relevance ofWinnicott's formulations about primary maternal preoccupation and theimportance of the holding environment. I would be witnessing the infant'sprimitive communications and anxieties in the form of normal projectiveidentifications, following Kleinian theories, and, building on her model,Bion's container-contained analogy and his concept of reverie.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.430
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian journal of psychoanalysisSame topicPsychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207