MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2472511613 · doi:10.3997/2214-4609.201601007

Mitigating Non-linearity in Full Waveform Inversion by Scaled Sobolev Pre-conditioning

2016· article· en· W2472511613 on OpenAlexaff
M. A. H. Zuberi, R. G. Pratt

Bibliographic record

Venue78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2016 · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSobolev spaceInversion (geology)A priori and a posterioriScalingAlgorithmMathematicsComputer scienceMathematical optimizationApplied mathematicsMathematical analysisGeologyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Seismic full waveform inversion (FWI) can be linearized by implementing a first-order Born approximation. However, this requires good a-priori knowledge of the background velocity. The problem of updating the background velocity in FWI can be handled by spatial scale separation of the velocity variations. Still, it is the Born approximation that decides which velocity scales can be considered as reflectivity which scale is the background. We propose a new scale separation technique based on spatial derivatives of the velocity functions. Its incorporation into FWI results in a pre-conditioning scheme that is a scaled version of the Sobolev gradient. The per-iteration computational cost in applying this scaled Sobolev pre-conditioner is negligible. Sobolev gradients have been used in image processing to help convergence in non-linear problems. In our scaled version, the scaling parameters allow switching between different scales of velocity updates and thereby mitigating the non-linearity in FWI by initially switching to very low-wavenumber (background velocity) updates; small scale updates are included naturally during the later iterations. Numerical examples on the Marmousi models show the potential of the scaled Sobolev preconditioning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.711
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue78th EAGE Conference and Exhibition 2016Same topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207