Structures of <b><i>a</i></b><sub><b><i>n</i></b></sub><i>*</i> Ions Derived from Protonated Pentaglycine and Pentaalanine: Results from IRMPD Spectroscopy and DFT Calculations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Infrared multiple-photon dissociation (IRMPD) spectroscopy and DFT calculations have been used to probe the most stable structures of a3(*) and a4(*) ions derived from both protonated pentaglycine (denoted G5) and pentaalanine (A5). The a3(*) and a4(*) ions derived from protonated A5 feature a CHR=N-CHR'- group at the N-terminus and an oxazolone ring at the C-terminus, as proposed previously [J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 19, 1788-1798 (2008)]. The isomeric a4(*) ion derived from A5 with a 3,5-dihydro-4H-imidazol-4-one ring structure was calculated to have a slightly better energy than the oxazolone, but the barrier to its formation is higher and there was no evidence of this ion in the IRMPD spectrum. By contrast, the a4(*) and [a4 - H2O](+) (denoted a4(0)) ions from G5 gave strikingly similar IRMPD spectra and both have the 3,5-dihydro-4H-imidazol-4-one ring structure similar to that recently reported for the [GGGG + H - H2O](+) ion [Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 316-318, 268-272 (2012)]. In the absence of a solvent molecule, the pathway to the oxazolone is calculated to be lower than those to thermodynamically more stable products, the a4(0) and the a4(*) with the 3,5-dihydro-4H-imidazol-4-one ring structure. Incorporation of one water molecule is sufficient to reduce the barrier to formation of the a4(0) of G5 to below that for formation of the oxazolone. On the equivalent potential energy surface for protonated A5 the barrier to formation of the a4(0) ion is 12.3 kcal mol(-1) higher than that for oxazolone formation and the a4(0) ion is not observed experimentally.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".