Représentations linguistiques d’élèves du secondaire à l’égard de la langue dans les contextes familier, scolaire et en sciences
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les lves vivant en milieu francophone minoritaire rencontrent quotidiennement diffrentes langues et diffrents registres de langue. Alors que leur contexte de vie familial et social fait usage d'un registre plus familier, l'cole favorise un registre plus soutenu et spcialis, particulirement dans les cours de sciences. Cette tude s'intresse dcrire et comprendre les reprsentations linguistiques que se font les lves dans ces diffrents contextes. Quatorze lves d'une classe de sciences de 10 e anne ont t interrogs au sujet de leurs reprsentations linguistiques et ont t observs lors de la pratique d'activits langagires en salle de classe. Les rsultats indiquent que les lves ont diffrentes reprsentations des langues et registres qu'ils utilisent quotidiennement dans leurs divers contextes de vie. Par ailleurs, les lves ne semblent pas conscients du rle des activits langagires dans leur apprentissage en sciences. Les rpercussions de ces rsultats sur la pdagogie sont brivement discutes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.013 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it