MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2472545106

Matthew Gwinne’s Nero (1603): Seneca, Academic Drama, and the Politics of Polity

2013· article· en· W2472545106 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Emma Buckley

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian review of comparative literature · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDramaTragedy (event)LiteraturePolityDepictionHistoriographyPoeticsPoliticsCharacter (mathematics)ObediencePower (physics)PhilosophyArtHistoryLawPolitical sciencePoetry
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this essay I analyse the role of Seneca in Matthew Gwinne’s Nero: A New Tragedy, arguing that this hybrid historical tragedy exhibits a sophisticated ‘Senecan’ reception in its depiction of a tyrant whose power is rooted not only in historical ‘fact’ but also in the nefarious poetics of Senecan tragedy. From there, I suggest that an examination of the character of Seneca himself in Nero complicates classification of this play as straightforwardly ‘homiletic’, and propose that this text offers a complex response to a hot contemporary issue, the question of Divine Right and the limits of obedience-in a way that puts academic drama at the centre, rather than the periphery, of contemporary historiography and drama.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian review of comparative literatureSame topicShakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary CriticismFrench-language works237,207