MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2472580380 · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00783

Mechanism of O(<sup>3</sup>P) Formation from a Hydroxyl Radical Pair in Aqueous Solution

2015· article· en· W2472580380 on OpenAlexafffund
Edelsys Codorniu‐Hernández, Kyle Wm. Hall, A. Daniel Boese, Daniel S. Ziemianowicz, Sheelagh Carpendale, Peter G. Kusalik

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Chemical Theory and Computation · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicFree Radicals and Antioxidants
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for InnovationUniversity of CalgaryKillam TrustsAlberta Innovates - Technology FuturesGovernment of Canada
KeywordsChemistrySolvationRadicalChemical physicsHydroxyl radicalAb initioElectron transferHydrogen atomMolecular orbitalSolvated electronProton-coupled electron transferComputational chemistryAqueous solutionPhotochemistryPhysical chemistryMoleculeRadiolysisGroup (periodic table)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reaction mechanism for the rapid formation of a triplet oxygen atom, O((3)P), from a pair of triplet-state hydroxyl radicals in liquid water is explored utilizing extensive Car-Parrinello MD simulations and advanced visualization techniques. The local solvation structures, the evolution of atomic charges, atomic separations, spin densities, electron localization functions, and frontier molecular orbitals, as well as free energy profiles, evidence that the reaction proceeds through a hybrid (hydrogen atom transfer and electron-proton transfer) and hemibond-assisted reaction mechanism. A benchmarking study utilizing high-level ab initio calculations to examine the interactions of a hydroxyl radical pair in the gas phase and the influence of a hemibonded water is also provided. The results presented here should serve as a foundation for further experimental and theoretical studies aimed at better understanding the role and potential applications of the triplet oxygen atom as a potent reactive oxygen species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.466
Threshold uncertainty score0.332

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Chemical Theory and ComputationSame topicFree Radicals and AntioxidantsFrench-language works237,207