[Serum amyloid a protein concentrations in patients with familial Mediterranean fever].
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: the determination of serum amyloid A (SAA) protein concentrations in FMF patients: the colchicine-resistant patients and the patients responded to the different doses of colchicine, and estimation of the risk of the amyloidosis development in these patients. SAA concentration was measured in 58 FMF patients: 23 colchicine-resistant patients without amyloidosis and 35 patients responded to the different doses of colchicine also without amyloidosis as a group of comparison. Serum SAA concentration was measured by ELISA (Enzyme Linked-Immuno-Sorbent-Assay) method using "ANOGEN" kit (Canada). Serum SAA concentration was the same in both groups of the patients: colchicine-resistant patients and patients responded to the different doses of colchicine. The findings of our study indicate that the risk of the amyloidosis development is the same in colchicine-resistant patients and patients responded to the different doses of colchicine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".