MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2472642302 · doi:10.1118/1.4955800

SU-F-R-28: Correction of FCh-PET Bladder Uptake Using Virtual Sinograms and Investigation of Its Impact On the Quantification of Prostate Textural Characteristics

2016· article· en· W2472642302 on OpenAlexaff
S. Laberge, Jean‐Mathieu Beauregard, Louis Archambault

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsHôtel-Dieu de Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProstateNuclear medicineProjection (relational algebra)MathematicsProstate cancerMedicineUrologyAlgorithmInternal medicineCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Textural biomarkers as a tool for quantifying intratumoral heterogeneity hold great promise for diagnosis and early assessment of treatment response in prostate cancer. However, spill-in counts from the bladder uptake are suspected to have an impact on the textural measurements of the prostate volume. This work proposes a correction method for the FCh-PET bladder uptake and investigates its impact on intraprostatic textural properties. Methods: Two patients with PC received pre-treatment dynamic FCh-PET scans reconstructed at four time points (interval: 2 min), for which prostate and bladder contours were obtained. Projection bins affected by bladder uptake were determined by forward-projection. For each time point and axial position, virtual sinograms were obtained and affected bins replaced by a weighted combination of original values and values interpolated using cubic spline from non-affected bins of the current and adjacent projection angles. The process was optimized using a genetic algorithm in terms of minimization of the root-mean-square error (RMSE) within the bladder between the corrected dynamic time point volume and a reference initial uptake volume. Finally, the impact of the bladder uptake correction on the prostate region was investigated using two standard SUV metrics (1) and three texture metrics (2): 1) SUVmax, SUVmean; 2) Contrast, Homogeneity, Coarseness. Results: Without bladder uptake correction, SUVmax and SUVmean were on average overestimated in the prostate by 0%, 0%, 33.2%, 51.2%, and 3.6%, 6.0%, 2.9%, 3.2%, for each time point respectively. Contrast varied by −9.1%, −6.7%, +40.4%, +107.7%, and Homogeneity and Coarseness by +4.5%, +1.8%, −8.8%, −14.8% and +1.0%, +0.5%, −9.5%, +0.9%. Conclusion: We proposed a method for FCh-PET bladder uptake correction and showed an impact on the quantification of the prostate signal. This method achieved a large reduction of intra-prostatic SUVmax while minimizing the impact on SUVmean. Further investigation is necessary to interpret changes in textural features. SL acknowledges partial support by the CREATE Medical Physics Research Training Network grant of the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (Grant number: 432290).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical Physics→Same topicProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment→French-language works237,207→