Ccme Water Quality Index in River Cauvery Basin at Talakadu, Southindia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cauvery a sacred river of South India which is considered as “Dakshina Ganga” for Hindu devotees is also an important source for agriculture and hydropower. The study was carried out to know the Water Quality Index (WQI) of river Cauvery, at Talakadu in Karnataka during Panchalingadarshana festival. WQI was assessed based on physico-chemical parameters using Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. WQI was found to be 48.49 which indicated “marginal” value, i.e., frequently impaired and conditions departed from desirable level.Biological Parameters such as Total bacterial count and MPN were found to be higher than normal value. H2S test was positive indicating fecal contamination. Presence of planktons such as Synedra ulna, Fragillaria bicepsand Oscillatoria species confirmed the polluted state of water. The study provided the status of river quality \nand this can help us to preserve precious water resources by planning and executing for protection, management and/or making lifestyle adaptations for the benefit of the environment. Key words: Cauvery, CCME, Water quality index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".