MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2472816308 · doi:10.1057/9781137388476_11

Racing Madness: The Terrorizing Madness of the Post-9/11 Terrorist Body

2014· book-chapter· en· W2472816308 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Shaista Patel

Bibliographic record

VenuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooks · 2014
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerrorismNewspaperPolitical sciencePoliticsLawPatriot ActAudience measurementNational securityMedia studiesSociologyCriminologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this chapter, I explore several key questions: What does the circulation of the figure of the “mad Muslim terrorist” do for secular-liberal Western democracies and their subjects? What needs to be in place for this figure to emerge in particular ways post-9/11? What kind of political rationalities are mobilized to legitimize extra-juridical incarceration of these “mad Muslim terrorists”? How does racial logic intersect with popular psy discourse in the emergence and circulation of the figure of the “mad Muslim terrorist”? I explore these questions in relation to a newspaper article entitled Insanity and Terrorism by Stewart Bell (2004) in the National Post , a nationally distributed right-leaning newspaper in Canada with a daily readership of 1.3 million, including online posts (National Post Staff 2012). Bell is an award-winning, popular Canadian journalist and senior reporter for the National Post where he regularly contributes columns on terrorism. His last two books dealt with terrorism in Canada, and his articles on terrorism have appeared in several magazines across the country. He is hailed as one of Canada’s “foremost reporters on terrorism.” A quick examination of his major publications reveals the racist “Canada as a safe haven for terrorists” logic that has been mobilized to legitimize the draconian antiterrorism (read anti-Muslim) legislation and security regime post-9/11 (Patel 2012). Therefore, while I am investigating just one of Bell’s articles, I want to emphasize that the discourse of the “mad Muslim terrorist” is not unique to this article, but offers an opening for studying complex questions about how the resistance and political movement of bodies produced at the nexus of race/religion and madness become recognizable figures of danger in our current geopolitical context. 1 These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.090
Threshold uncertainty score0.180

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.015
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePalgrave Macmillan US eBooksSame topicTerrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political ViolenceFrench-language works237,207