Bibliographic record
Abstract
A body John Coplans New York: powerHouse Books; 2002 164 pp, 115 duotone photos, 3 gatefolds US$60 ISBN 1-57687-136-3 Amid banter about the futility of life and the inevitability of death in Samuel Beckett's play, Waiting for Godot, Vladimir says to Estragon, “We have time to grow old.” Yet in our society aging is a process that is often disguised, unacknowledged and delayed for as long as possible. In A Body, a new collection that represents a 20-year history of nude self-portraiture, John Coplans reveals the traditionally concealed reality of the aging male body . In 1980, at age 60, after a highly influential career as a writer, critic, curator and a founding editor of Artforum magazine, John Coplans committed himself to becoming a photographer. His initial period of experimentation and exploration with the camera lasted about five years and brought him to recognize his artistic subject: his own naked body. Twenty-two years later his headless, nude form, or various parts of it, remains the exclusive subject of his work. These photographs, shot in black and white against an unobtrusive white background, not only display images that are culturally invisible, but also delve into what binds all humans together. Coplans believes that his body, like everyone else's, is the culmination of a process of evolution. His genes link him to “remote ancestors, both male and female.” It is as if the history of all humankind were written in the creases of his aging flesh. In a photo of his chest and abdomen, void of his head or appendages, Coplans' nipples form eyes, his umbilicus creates a mouth and his copious body hair works together with these elements to create the depth and expression of a disapproving face. This is the face of Everyman, which in this faceless self-portrait acts to give the subject a presence, identity and value in a society that discounts people on the basis of age. A transcript from an interview with John Coplans in 1994 by Jean-Francois Chevrier follows the images in the book. Coplans, having long been an influential commentator on art, is unable to create a work without also expressing his views on it. “I'm seventy years old,” he says, “and generally bodies of seventy-year-old men look somewhat like my body. It's a neglected subject matter ... . So, I'm using my body and saying, even though it's a seventy-year-old body, I can make it extremely interesting. That keeps me alive and gives me vitality. It's a kind of process of energizing myself.” Throughout his photographic career, Coplans has consistently proved that he is able to make his body curious and compelling. This book spans his photographic development with images that examine his body in its general form and in its details. These are pictures that seek out the rules of anatomy and then attempt to transform them with a fresh perspective. The close-up views of body parts such as hands, feet and back provide us with a renewed perspective. A series of photos titled Interlocking Fingers show woven appendages in minute detail. Even when reduced to a smaller scale in this book, the cascade of bands of flesh are larger than life. They form beautiful and complex forms, like patterns of frost crystals on a winter window, highlighted by deep creases and errant hairs. In other series, each consisting of two, three or four images, Coplans breaks down his body into torso, midsection and legs. The individual images are placed in sequence to re-form the body and convey a cohesive pose. These disjointed views flow into one another and express strength with clenched fists, confidence with the focus on the genitals, and even femininity. One of these images presents a side view of Coplans lying flat on his back with hands crossed peacefully over his chest.This is the image of a corpse. Its reminder of death shatters the quest for eternal youth, and warns that no matter how much make-up, hair dye and cosmetic surgery we turn to, decay comes to us all. Coplans' images offer a repeated confrontation with our culture. They present an unseen and frank reality that contradicts what our society reveres: beauty, glamour and sexiness. In the mass-produced world of corporate-driven publicity, everyone is tall, toned and youthful. Coplans' work defies the cult of uniformity and allows the presence of maps of wrinkles, the unruliness of unwanted hair, and the flabby sprawl of things that were once constrained by the shape of youth. Jonah Samson Family Medicine Resident St. Michael's Hospital Toronto, Ont.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.084 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".