Distributed Extended Kalman Filtering for Wastewater Treatment Processes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A wastewater treatment plant is a large-scale nonlinear system including a series of biological reactors and a settler. In this work, we propose a distributed state estimation scheme for wastewater treatment processes in the context of extended Kalman filtering. Specifically, we consider a wastewater treatment process that includes a five-compartment reactor and an ideal splitter. First, we present a method to design the sensor network for the process and then discuss how the process may be decomposed into subsystems for distributed state estimation. We present a detailed design of the distributed filters and a detailed distributed state estimation algorithm to coordinate the actions of the different filters. Without loss of generality, we consider the entire system as being decomposed into two subsystems. The proposed approach can be extended in a straightforward fashion to include more subsystems. The distributed scheme is compared with the corresponding centralized extended Kalman filtering scheme under different weather conditions. Simulation results show that the distributed scheme can give comparable estimation performance to the centralized scheme or even better performance than the centralized scheme. Also, the distributed estimation scheme is shown to have more stable performance under different noise conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".