Poser les jalons d’une didactique de la grammaire du français en milieu minoritaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In light of the challenges related to teaching and learning French where it is a minority language, the authors of this paper suggest a way to rethink grammar teaching and learning according to the sociolinguistic reality of pupils who are schooled in French outside of Québec, in Canada. Based upon a theoretical framework that combines the didactic of plurilingualism and the current didactic transposition of grammar teaching in French schools across Canada, the article discusses the use of the analytical tools provided by the new grammar – the syntactic manipulations and the basic sentence – as well as the articulation of the different components of the French discipline in a didactic sequence, while constantly emphasizing the specificities that characterize students who learn French in a minority setting. À la lumière des enjeux qui sont propres à l’enseignement et à l’apprentissage du français en situation de minorité linguistique, les auteurs proposent dans cet article une réflexion théorique et repensent la didactique de la grammaire en fonction de la réalité sociolinguistique dans laquelle évoluent les populations scolaires de langue française à l’extérieur du Québec, au Canada. À partir d’un cadre théorique composé de la didactique du plurilinguisme et de la transposition didactique actuelle en ce qui a trait à l’enseignement grammatical dans les écoles de langue française au Canada, ils abordent notamment l’utilisation des outils d’analyse qui sont offerts par la grammaire nouvelle – les manipulations syntaxiques et la phrase de base – et l’articulation des composantes de la discipline français au sein de séquences didactiques, et ce, en mettant l’accent sur les spécificités qui marquent les élèves scolarisés en français où cette langue est minoritaire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.016 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".