MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2473320632 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22589

H<sub>2</sub> separation using tubular stainless steel supported natural clinoptilolite membranes

2016· article· en· W2473320632 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Afrooz Farjoo, Steven M. Kuznicki

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicZeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsClinoptilolitePermeanceMaterials scienceMembraneNatural gasPermeationHydrogenPorosityCoatingZeoliteChemical engineeringAir separationGas separationMetallurgyAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Composite materialChromatographyOxygenChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Disk membranes generated from high‐purity natural clinoptilolite mineral rock have shown promising hydrogen separation performance. To scale up production of these types of membranes for industrial gas separation, a coating strategy was devised. A mixture of natural clinoptilolite and aluminum silicate was deposited on the inner surface of porous stainless steel tubes by the slip casting technique. Phase composition and morphology of the coating materials were investigated using X‐ray diffraction. The performance was evaluated for a range of gases using single gas permeation tests at different temperatures and pressures. Introduction of the second layer significantly improved the performance of the membrane system. The experiments on the double‐layered membranes measured a hydrogen permeance of 1.65 × 10 −7 mol · m −2 · s −1 · Pa −1 at 300 °C. H 2 /CO 2 and H 2 /C 2 H 6 single gas selectivity was 10.2 and 8.45 respectively at 25 °C and feed pressure of 110 kPa. These results show that natural zeolite coated stainless steel tubular membranes have high potential for large‐scale gas separation at high temperature requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.487

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicZeolite Catalysis and SynthesisFrench-language works237,207