MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2473405529 · doi:10.29173/cais275

Core Competencies for Public Libraries in a Networked World

2013· article· fr· W2473405529 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Annual Conference of CAIS / Actes du congrès annuel de l ACSI · 2013
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicCompetency Development and Evaluation
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCore competencyLibrary sciencePolitical scienceIdentification (biology)HumanitiesSociologyComputer scienceBusinessArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Identifying the knowledge and skills needed by library staff in a networked environment compared to the traditional print-based environment provides a challenge for library administrators. This paper discusses the use of core competencies in six public libraries in Canada. The list of competencies is discussed, together with its implications for library managers and library educators.L’identification des connaissances et des compétences nécessaires pour les bibliothécaires dans un environnement réseauté comparé aux environnements traditionnels basés sur l’imprimé présente un défi pour les gestionnaires des bibliothèques. Cet article traite de l’utilisation des compétences indispensables dans six bibliothèques publiques au Canada. La liste des compétences est présentée, de même que les implications pour les gestionnaires et les spécialistes des bibliothèques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch, Meta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.268
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.012
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.103
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it