MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2473412983 · doi:10.15173/m.v1i29.1182

Vitamin D Gains: A look at Potatoes, Vitamin D, and Symbiotic Relationships.

2016· article· en· W2473412983 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Gurrattan Chandhoke, Jennifer Herman, Avika Misra, Eric Batista Ferreira

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Meducator · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicVitamin D Research Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVitamin D and neurologyVitaminMedicineBiologyEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vitamin D deficiency is a health issue that affects millions of people worldwide. In 2013, one in ten Canadians were reported to have a vitamin D deficiency. Recent research proposes that vitamin D deficiency can be addressed by creating a vitamin D-rich food source. Plant species contaminated with fungi contain traces of vitamin D, suggesting that vitamin D may be transferred from fungal organisms to plants in a mutualistic symbiotic relationship. This relationship exists between arbuscular mycorrhizae and Solanum tuberosum, a common potato plant that provides food security for millions living in Africa, Asia and South America. We propose that the pathway of radioactively labelled vitamin D from fungi to host plant can be followed in order to identify the protein responsible for transporting vitamin D. Once the genomic sequence of the transporter protein is identified, the gene can be upregulated to increase protein expression and consequently, vitamin D content in S. tuberosum crops. Understanding the specific vitamin D transfer process from fungi to plants will enable sustainable and large-scale production of vitamin D-rich food sources.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe MeducatorSame topicVitamin D Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207