MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2473516275 · doi:10.2516/ogst/2015039

Isothermal Permeability of the Argillaceous Cobourg Limestone

2016· article· en· W2473516275 on OpenAlexafffundabout
A. P. S. Selvadurai, M. Najari

Bibliographic record

VenueOil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvelles · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRock Mechanics and Modeling
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNuclear Waste Management Organization
KeywordsPermeability (electromagnetism)GeologyIsothermal processGeotechnical engineeringMineralogyMaterials scienceThermodynamicsMembraneChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents the results of an experimental evaluation of the permeability of the heterogeneous argillaceous limestone from the Cobourg formation located in southern Ontario, Canada. The low permeability of the limestone necessitated the development of experimental techniques for effectively measuring the permeability of the rock. In particular, we examine the results of pressurization of a fluid-filled co-axial cylindrical cavity of finite length cored into a 150 mm diameter cylinder of the Cobourg Limestone. The orientation of the cavity is either normal to or along the nominal stratifications identified by the argillaceous partings separating the quartzitic phases. Both steady state and transient tests are used to estimate the permeability of the Cobourg Limestone. The paper also investigates the influence of a nominal axial load on the permeability of the rock.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.365

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOil & Gas Science and Technology – Revue d’IFP Energies nouvellesSame topicRock Mechanics and ModelingFrench-language works237,207