MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Comparison Of Saline-, Salt Tablets- And Glycerol-induced Hyperhydration On Fluid Balance In Healthy Young Men

2015· article· en· W2473538926 on OpenAlexaff
Eric Goulet, David Jeker, Félix-Antoine Savoie, Audrey Asselin

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThermoregulation and physiological responses
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryFluid intakePalatabilitySalineAnimal scienceGlycerolDehydrationHematocritInternal medicineFood scienceBiochemistryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pre-exercise hyperhydration may help maintain, or limit the degradation of, endurance performance and physiological functions during prolonged exercises with limited fluid availability. We recently demonstrated that saline-induced hyperhydration (SIH) substantially improves fluid retention, compared with glycerol-induced hyperhydration (GIH). One drawback associated with SIH is its lack of palatability. We hypothesized that ingesting large fluid volumes concurrently with salt tablets (STIH) may offer the same fluid-retention advantage than SIH, without the disadvantage associated with its poor palatability. PURPOSE: To compare the effects of STIH, SIH and GIH on fluid balance responses during a 3h hyperhydration protocol. METHODS: Using a randomised, counterbalanced protocol, 16 young men (21 ± 2 yrs, 65 ± 6 kg fat-free mass (FFM)) underwent three, 3h hyperhydration protocols during which they ingested, during the initial 60 min, 30 mL/kg FFM of water with an artificial sweetener plus 1) 7.5 dissolved salt tablets (1g each)/L (SIH); 2) 7.5 un-dissolved salt tablets (1g each)/L (STIH) or; 3) 1.4 g glycerol/kg FFM (GIH). Changes in urine production, fluid retention, hemoglobin, hematocrit, plasma volume and perceptual variables were monitored throughout the trials. RESULTS: Subjects ingested a total of 1948 ± 182 mL (25.3 ± 1.4 mL/kg bodyweight) of tangerine-flavoured solution with either 14.5 ± 1.4 dissolved salt tablets (SIH), 14.5 ± 1.4 un-dissolved salt tablets (STIH) or 90.9 ± 8.5 g of glycerol (1.2 ± 0.1 g/kg bodyweight) (GIH) during the initial hour of experimentation. After 3h, there were no significant (P>0.05) differences between treatments for hemoglobin, hematocrit (STIH: 43.2 ± 2.9%; SIH: 43.3 ± 2.9%; GIH: 44.3 ± 2.7%;) and plasma volume changes (STIH: 14.3 ± 11.5%; SIH: 10.4 ± 8.7%; GIH: 4.7 ± 11.3%). Urine production (STIH: 1047 ± 310 mL; SIH: 808 ± 207 mL; GIH: 1216 ± 238 mL) was significantly (P<0.05) lower and fluid retention (STIH: 905 ± 340 mL; SIH: 1150 ± 287 mL; GIH: 800 ± 211 mL) higher with SIH than STIH or GIH, with no difference between STIH and GIH. No differences were found between treatments for perceptual variables. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that SIH reduces urine production and provides more fluid retention than either STIH or GIH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicThermoregulation and physiological responsesFrench-language works237,207