CFD simulation of interfacial instability from the nozzle in the formation of viscous core‐annular flow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The interfacial instability in the development of core‐annular flow by the influence of the inlet nozzle in a horizontal pipe was investigated by computational fluid dynamics (CFD). The two‐phase flow has been simulated using Volume‐Of‐Fluid model (VOF) and k‐ϵ turbulence model for the core (viscous oil) and the annular phase (water). The simulation results showed that by increasing the water input fraction, the interfacial instability appeared when the eccentricity of the core with an upward position and an oscillating position were generated by the input pressure, turbulent kinetic, and buoyancy force. In the development of the perfect core‐annular flow an input concentric core changes to eccentric position with negligible turbulence. The onset of entrainment is formed by a reverse flow at the junction of the two‐phase at the nozzle exit. The interfacial formation was analyzed using a proposed two‐phase Froude number and modified Eötvos number involving the water input fraction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".