MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Pulmonary Function And Heart Rate Variability Responses To Low- And High-intensity Cycling In Diesel Exhaust

2015· article· en· W2473850788 on OpenAlexaff
Luisa V. Giles, Christopher Carlsten, Michael S. Koehle

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsDouglas College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeart rate variabilityCardiologyIntensity (physics)MedicineCyclingHeart ratePulmonary function testingExercise intensityInternal medicineRespirationPhysical therapyBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Exposure to diesel exhaust (DE) prior to exercise increases exercise heart rate and attenuates exercise-induced bronchodilation. However, the effects of exercise combined with air pollution on pulmonary function and heart rate variability (HRV) are unclear. Furthermore, it is often assumed that increases in exercise intensity will increase the dose of air pollution, thus magnifying the resultant health effects. However, how the effects of DE on pulmonary function and HRV are modulated by exercise intensity is unknown. PURPOSE: To determine the effects to low- and high-intensity cycling in DE on pulmonary function and HRV. METHODS: Eighteen males performed 30-minute trials of low (30% VO2peak power) and high-intensity (60% VO2peak power) cycling and a resting control condition. For each subject, each trial was performed once breathing filtered air (FA) and once breathing DE (300ug/m3 of PM2.5), for a total of 6 trials. Pulmonary function and HRV were measured before, immediately after, and 1 h, and 2 h post-exposure to DE or FA. Time domain measures of HRV included the standard deviation of normal-to-normal intervals (SDNN), the root mean square of the mean differences in successive N-N intervals (RMSSD), and the HRV triangular index. Frequency domain analysis included low frequency power (LFP: 0.04–0.15 Hz), high frequency power (HFP: 0.15–0.40 Hz) as well as total power (TP). Additionally, LF and HF normalized units (LFnu, HFnu), and LF/HF ratios were determined. RESULTS: Exposure to DE had no significant effect on pulmonary function or HRV (p<0.05). As expected all time and frequency domain indices of HRV significantly decreased following high-intensity exercise (p<0.05; Pre to post high-intensity exercise: SDNN 1018.7 vs. 730.1 ms, RMSSD 65.2 vs. 19.5 ms, HRV triangular index 14.3 vs. 7.2, LFP 1408.8 vs. 455.7 ms2, HFP 1487.0 vs. 391.1 ms2, TP 4949.0 vs. 1152.8 ms2, HFnu 44.5 vs. 19.8). The exception to this pattern was LFnu and LF/HF ratio, which significantly increased following high-intensity exercise (p<0.05; Pre to post high-intensity exercise: LFnu 51.7 vs. 71.8, LF/HF 1.49 vs. 4.52). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that acute exposure to DE during exercise does not affect pulmonary function or HRV. Furthermore, performing high intensity exercise does not potentiate the effects of DE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicAir Quality and Health Impacts→French-language works237,207→