L'expérience de pères africains originaires du Maghreb de l'établissement de la relation père-enfant en contexte d'allaitement maternel au Québec
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’experience des peres de l’etablissement de la relation avec leur enfant est determinante pour leur adaptation a leur nouveau role de pere. Pour les peres immigrants, la transition de l’immigration s’ajoute a celle de la parentalite. Or, l’immigration fragilise le reseau social qui joue un role crucial en periode post-natale. Les infirmieres qui interviennent aupres des familles en periode post-natale ne savent pas toujours comment soutenir les peres immigrants afin que ceux-ci restent engages aupres de leur famille tout en s’adaptant a leur societe d’accueil. Cette etude qualitative a pour objectifs d’identifier les perceptions des peres originaires du Maghreb concernant le role de pere et d’explorer leur experience du developpement de la relation pere-enfant dans un contexte d’allaitement maternel. Les donnees ont ete recueillies aupres de 12 peres immigres du Maghreb depuis moins de 10 ans lors d’entrevues semi-dirigees integrant la technique de l’incident critique et le genogramme. Suite a l’analyse des donnees, les perceptions des participants de leur role de pere et de leur experience en regard au developpement de la relation avec leur nouveau-ne sont presentees. Les resultats permettent de formuler des recommandations pour la pratique infirmiere clinique, pour la recherche et pour l’enseignement en sante familiale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".