MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2474007778 · doi:10.1287/trsc.2015.0628

Network Pricing of Congestion-Free Networks: The Elastic and Linear Demand Case

2016· article· en· W2474007778 on OpenAlexafffund
Aimé Kamgaing Kuiteing, Patrice Marcotte, Gilles Savard

Bibliographic record

VenueTransportation Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicTransportation Planning and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTollPrice elasticity of demandMathematical optimizationFlow networkQuadratic equationPath (computing)Elasticity (physics)RevenueComputer scienceMathematicsEconomicsMicroeconomicsComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we address the problem of maximizing the revenue raised from tolls set on a multicommodity transportation network, taking into account that users are assigned to cheapest paths, and that demand is a linearly decreasing function of total path cost (initial cost of carrying the products plus toll). We propose for its numerical solution three mixed quadratic formulations, either in arc or path flow space. Similar to what was achieved in the fixed demand case, we analyze the structure and properties of the problem, including its theoretical complexity. On the computational side, we analyze the sensitivity of central processing unit time with respect to two key parameters, namely, demand elasticity and percentage of toll arcs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransportation ScienceSame topicTransportation Planning and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207