Heat Shock Protein 90 kDa (Hsp90) Has a Second Functional Interaction Site with the Mitochondrial Import Receptor Tom70
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To accomplish its crucial role, mitochondria require proteins that are produced in the cytosol, delivered by cytosolic Hsp90, and translocated to its interior by the translocase outer membrane (TOM) complex. Hsp90 is a dimeric molecular chaperone and its function is modulated by its interaction with a large variety of co-chaperones expressed within the cell. An important family of co-chaperones is characterized by the presence of one TPR (tetratricopeptide repeat) domain, which binds to the C-terminal MEEVD motif of Hsp90. These include Tom70, an important component of the TOM complex. Despite a wealth of studies conducted on the relevance of Tom70·Hsp90 complex formation, there is a dearth of information regarding the exact molecular mode of interaction. To help fill this void, we have employed a combined experimental strategy consisting of cross-linking/mass spectrometry to investigate binding of the C-terminal Hsp90 domain to the cytosolic domain of Tom70. This approach has identified a novel region of contact between C-Hsp90 and Tom70, a finding that is confirmed by probing the corresponding peptides derived from cross-linking experiments via isothermal titration calorimetry and mitochondrial import assays. The data generated in this study are combined to input constraints for a molecular model of the Hsp90/Tom70 interaction, which has been validated by small angle x-ray scattering, hydrogen/deuterium exchange, and mass spectrometry. The resultant model suggests that only one of the MEEVD motifs within dimeric Hsp90 contacts Tom70. Collectively, our findings provide significant insight on the mechanisms by which preproteins interact with Hsp90 and are translocated via Tom70 to the mitochondria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".