Selected Contribution: Effects of contractile activity on mitochondrial transcription factor A expression in skeletal muscle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mitochondrial transcription factor A (Tfam) is a nuclear-encoded gene product that is imported into mitochondria and is required for the transcription of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA). We hypothesized that conditions known to produce mitochondrial biogenesis in skeletal muscle would be preceded by an increase in Tfam expression. Therefore, rat muscle was stimulated (10 Hz, 3 h/day). Tfam mRNA levels were significantly elevated (by 55%) at 4 days and returned to control levels at 14 days. Tfam import into intermyofibrillar (IMF) mitochondria was increased by 52 and 61% (P < 0.05) at 5 and 7 days, respectively. This corresponded to an increase in the level of import machinery components. Immunoblotting data indicated that IMF Tfam protein content was increased by 63% (P < 0.05) at 7 days of stimulation. This was associated with a 49% (P < 0.05) increase in complex formation at the mtDNA promoter and a 65% (P < 0.05) increase in the levels of a mitochondrial transcript, cytochrome-c oxidase (COX) subunit III. Similarly, COX enzyme activity was elevated by 71% (P < 0.05) after 7 days of contractile activity. These results indicate that early events in mitochondrial biogenesis include increases in Tfam mRNA, followed by accelerations in mitochondrial import and increased Tfam content, which correspond with increased binding to the mtDNA promoter region. This was accompanied by increased mitochondrial transcript levels and elevated COX activity. These data support the role of Tfam as a regulatory protein involved in contractile activity-induced mitochondrial biogenesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.106 | 0.019 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".