MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2474148437 · doi:10.3406/bagf.2001.2235

Dallas-Fort Worth et Toronto : des très grandes villes aux centres-villes malmenés (Dallas-For Worth and Toronto : two larges cities with threaten dowtowns)

2001· article· fr· W2474148437 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Florence Smits

Bibliographic record

VenueBulletin de l Association de géographes français · 2001
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrbanization and City Planning
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé. - L'équipement commercial en Amérique du Nord est marqué par des surfaces moyennes de magasin plus grandes qu'en Europe, des prix plus faibles mais des distances à parcourir par le consommateur qui sont plus grandes. Au sein de l'appareil commercial, les chaînes et les nouvelles formes de commerces - magasins d'usine... - sont de plus en plus nombreuses, notamment dans les banlieues. Ceci désavantage le centre-ville car le foncier y est cher et relativement rare tandis que la circulation automobile y est malaisée. Néanmoins, l'examen de Toronto et de Dallas - Fort Worth révèle qu'au-delà de ces points communs, l'évolution n'est pas partout aussi radicale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.585
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBulletin de l Association de géographes françaisSame topicUrbanization and City PlanningFrench-language works237,207