Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Scanlon Foundation social cohesion surveys were conducted in Australia during June-August 2007. They involved a national survey of 2,000 respondents and five local area surveys conducted in regions of high immigrant concentration, with a total of 1,500 respondents. The design of the questionnaire was based on a review of international and Australian studies and included questions to enable benchmarking of findings against earlier research. The 2007 surveys mark a significant Australian development in the study of attitudes analysed through the prism of birthplace and ancestry. This presentation will consider the major findings within five domains of social cohesion: belonging, social justice, acceptance, participation and self-worth. It will give particular attention to findings for New South Wales and Sydney, interpreted with attention to Australia-level data and recent Canadian and British research. The broad Australian indicators point to a society that is succeeding in establishing and maintaining a high level of positive outcomes: the challenges are within the domains of participation and acceptance, with a significant level of misunderstanding between birthplace groups and experience of discriminatory and hostile behaviour.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".