MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

NSLS-II Digital RF Controller Logic and Applications

2015· paratext· en· W2474224817 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Brian Holub, Feng Gao, J.G. Kulpin, C. Marques, Jorge Oliva, J. Rose, N. Towne

Bibliographic record

VenueOSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) · 2015
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicParticle Accelerators and Free-Electron Lasers
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Light SourceU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsLinear particle acceleratorStorage ringBooster (rocketry)PhysicsRing (chemistry)Controller (irrigation)Particle acceleratorComputer scienceComputer hardwareElectrical engineeringEngineeringOpticsBeam (structure)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The National Synchrotron Light Source II accelerator consists of the Storage Ring, the Booster Ring, and Linac along with their associated cavities. NSLS II is committed to the use of digital RF controllers for controlling these cavities. Given the number, types and variety of functions of these cavities, we sought to limit the logic development effort by reuse of parameterized code on one hardware platform. Currently we have fielded six controllers in the NSLS II system. There are two controllers each in both the Storage ring and Booster. The first controller in each is used to control the cavity field and the second controller used for diagnostics. In the Linac a controller is provided which modulates the eGUN grid to generate the bunches. Lastly, in the Master Oscillator Distribution System a controller is used to make phase corrections to the outgoing master oscillator clock signal to account for thermal phase drifts along the distribution path.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.269

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0800.029

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)Same topicParticle Accelerators and Free-Electron LasersFrench-language works237,207