MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2474262080

Boxes and Bridges: Robert Lepage's Le Confessionnal and La Face cachée de la lune

2008· article· fr· W2474262080 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nathalie G. Cornelius

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œFrench review · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicContemporary Literature and Criticism
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRevelationConfessionalCounterpointIgnoranceIdentity (music)Face (sociological concept)ArtConfession (law)Art historyPhilosophyLiteratureHistorySociologyAestheticsEpistemologyLinguisticsLawPolitical scienceArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

French Canadian Robert Lepage's first and last films to date explore the effects of emotional confinement. Both a confessional box and the dark side of the moon are metaphors for guilty secrets. In Robert Lepage's films, enclosed spaces and hidden nooks illustrate the entrapment of those who live in ignorance of these truths. In counterpoint to these isolating barriers are bridges symbolic of revelation and integration, connecting the past to the present, and biological and historical origins to individual identity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.611
Threshold uncertainty score0.807

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œFrench reviewSame topicContemporary Literature and CriticismFrench-language works237,207