MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2474347620 · doi:10.1136/bmj.i3432

The most vulnerable refugees are not in Europe

2016· article· en· W2474347620 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nikesh Parekh

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMiddle East Politics and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefugeeSyrian refugeesPolitical scienceAgency (philosophy)Palestinian refugeesQuarter (Canadian coin)GeographyAncient historyHistoryLawSociologyArchaeologySocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Remember the millions of people camped on Syria’s borders Recent attention to the plight of refugees escaping the war in Syria has focused on those trying to cross the Mediterranean to safety in Europe. But the most deprived refugees, those who don’t have the resources to attempt such a journey, have been forgotten. European leaders must shift attention back to these millions of refugees stranded in camps close to Syria’s borders. The United Nations Refugee Agency (UNHCR) estimates that about 1.5 million Syrian refugees are in Lebanon, for example, making up a quarter of its population.1 Lebanon is restricting further entry to refugees, but the Syrian conflict remains bloody, with no end in sight. Lebanon has a “no …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score0.405

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJSame topicMiddle East Politics and SocietyFrench-language works237,207