ОБЩАЯ ТЕОРИЯ ОТНОСИТЕЛЬНОСТИ И МЕТРИКИ НЕОДНОРОДНОЙ ВРАЩАЮЩЕЙСЯ ВСЕЛЕННОЙ GENERAL RELATIVITY AND METRICS OF INHOMOGENEOUS ROTATING UNIVERSE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Director, A&E Trounev IT Consulting, Toronto, Canada Обсуждается метрика неоднородной вращающейся Вселенной . Даны примеры универсальных метрик , получаемых в теории гравитации Эйнштейна . На основе решений уравнений Эйнштейна предложены универсальные метрики , описывающие свойства галактик , групп и кластеров галактик в неоднородной , вращающейся Вселенной The metric of inhomogeneous rotating Universe is discussed. There are examples of universal metrics obtained in Einstein's theory of gravitation. On the basis of solutions of Einstein’s equation we have proposed universal metric describing the properties of galaxies, groups and clusters of galaxies in inhomogeneous rotating Universe Ключевые слова : МЕТАГАЛАКТИКА , ГАЛАКТИЧЕСКИЙ КЛАСТЕР , ГЕОМЕТРИЯ ПРОСТРАНСТВА -ВРЕМЕНИ , ТЕОРИЯ ГРАВИТАЦИИ ЭЙНШТЕЙНА , КОСМОЛОГИЯ , ТЕМНАЯ МАТЕРИЯ , ТЕМНАЯ ЭНЕРГИЯ Keywords: COSMOLOGY, GENERAL RELATIVITY, GALACTIC CLUSTER, SPACE-TIME GEOMETRY, BLACK MATTER, BLACK ENERGY
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".