MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2474634732 · doi:10.14740/wjnu267w

Steroid Retrial After Rituximab and Mycophenolate Mofetil in Pediatric Refractory Nephrotic Syndrome

2016· article· en· W2474634732 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Amrit Kirpalani, Guido Filler, Joanne Grimmer, Vladimir Belostosky, Steven Arora, Ajay P. Sharma

Bibliographic record

VenueWorld Journal of Nephrology and Urology · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster Children's HospitalMcMaster UniversityLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRituximabNephrotic syndromeMycophenolatePrednisoneRefractory (planetary science)GastroenterologyInternal medicineCyclophosphamidePlasmapheresisPediatricsImmunologyTransplantationChemotherapyLymphoma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) is a challenging condition. In pediatric SRNS, cyclosporine is the first-line treatment choice, with approximately 60% success rate. In cyclosporine-resistant disease, treatment modalities such as cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), tacrolimus, vincristine, galactose, plasmapheresis and rituximab have been tried with variable success. In this paper, we report a patient with SRNS who remained resistant to all the above stated medications except a moderate response to rituximab. After rituximab, MMF re-initiation did not induce further improvement. Prednisone retrial thereafter induced a prompt remission. The significance of this finding in context with current literature has been discussed. World J Nephrol Urol. 2016;5(2):33-36 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/wjnu267w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWorld Journal of Nephrology and UrologySame topicRenal Diseases and GlomerulopathiesFrench-language works237,207