Study on Flow Parameters Measurement Experiment of Polymer Solution in Porous Media
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to the complexity of porous media and viscoelasticity of polymer solution, the flow behavior of polymer solution in porous media is more complex than that in the rheometer, and the flow regular pattern of polymer solution in porous media directly affects the formulation of polymer flooding projects. This paper designs experiment on flow parameters measurement of polymer solution (partially hydrolyzed polyacrylamide) in porous media, and the regular pattern of influence on resistance factor, residual resistance factor and flow viscosity in porous media caused by core permeability, polymer concentration, polymer molecular weight and polymer injection rate was given. The followings are the results: even for the same batch core with similar parameters, due to reasons such as natural fractures which could lead to comparatively large difference of core parameters between the same batch of core, thus in order to ensure the reliability of experiment data, it is necessary to detect core quality before core flooding experiment. Core end effect has significant effect on the results of core flooding experiment, it suggests that we should eliminate the effect of core end effect when carry out core flooding experiment, otherwise it is difficult to obtain valid experiment data. There exists a critical polymer concentration, when polymer concentration is lower than critical concentration, resistance factor is basically equal to apparent viscosity; when polymer concentration is higher than critical concentration, resistance factor is far less than apparent viscosity and the difference value increases with the increase of polymer concentration. Flow viscosity of polymer solution in porous media is far less than apparent viscosity in the rheometer and when polymer concentration increases, the increase extent of flow viscosity is far less than the increase of apparent viscosity. Results of this research are of great importance for enhancing flooding effect and guiding oilfield production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".