MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2474721870 · doi:10.1109/lsp.2016.2584780

Low-Complexity Design of Noninteger Fractionally Spaced Adaptive Equalizers for Coherent Optical Receivers

2016· article· en· W2474721870 on OpenAlexaff
Syed Faisal Shah, Lei Wang, Chuandong Li, Zhuhong Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Letters · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsHuawei Technologies (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdaptive equalizerEqualization (audio)Decoupling (probability)EqualizerComputer scienceDistortion (music)Sampling (signal processing)Channel (broadcasting)AlgorithmComputational complexity theoryJoint (building)Electronic engineeringControl theory (sociology)TelecommunicationsBandwidth (computing)Artificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this letter, we address the design of fractionally spaced adaptive equalizers when the input signal is sampled with noninteger, subsymbol sampling. We consider the problem of joint equalization and sample rate conversion and derive a stochastic gradient-based weight update algorithm for the equalizer. This enables us to decouple the equalization of channel impairments from that of fixed (periodic) distortion arising from noninteger, subsymbol sampling. This decoupling leads to a novel low-complexity architecture for the equalizer that shows superior or equal performance as compared to the existing architectures with higher complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Signal Processing LettersSame topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207