Olfactory Fossa Meningioma Presenting as Depressive Disorder: A Case Report
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Meningiomas are common, usually benign intracranial tumors. They grow slowly and can remain asymptomatic for many years. Meningiomas can present as mental disorders rather than with neurologic signs or symptoms. In this case report we describe a middle-aged man with a 2-year history of depressive disorder who was diagnosed with a large olfactory fossa meningioma after he developed mental status changes and urinary incontinence. After the tumor was removed, the patient's depressive symptoms resolved and his neurocognitive functions improved. We discuss the patient's neuropsychological and psychiatric profiles to identify symptoms and other clues that could expedite identification of meningiomas in patients with psychiatric disorders. Because olfactory fossa meningiomas can present as depressive disorder, we recommend brain imaging to rule out organic brain lesions in middle-aged and older patients with new-onset psychiatric symptoms. Although tumor removal brought improvement of our patient's mental state and neurocognitive functions, patients may not be able to recover their cognitive functions completely.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".