MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2474910314 · doi:10.2524/jtappij.70.363

Energy Saving by Introduction of Thermocompressor to the Container Board Machine

2016· article· en· W2474910314 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJAPAN TAPPI JOURNAL · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicModeling, Simulation, and Optimization
Canadian institutionsMiller Group (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContainer (type theory)Computer scienceEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

レンゴー八潮工場は,工場をあげての省エネルギーに取り組んでおり,その活動は社会的にも様々な面で認められてきている。本報では,その活動の一環として行った,余剰蒸気の回収を目的としたサーモコンプレッサーの検討・導入について述べる。レンゴーの抄紙機ではサーモコンプレッサーの使用経験が無かったが,最低限必要な制御機器の構成を見出すことができ,操業の妨げになるような問題も無く,電力を消費することなく余剰蒸気の回収が可能であるという結果が得られた。サーモコンプレッサーを用いた余剰蒸気の回収は,今回は必ずしも最適な設計とはならなかったが,抄紙機条件によっては非常に有効なシステムになると思われる。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.811
Threshold uncertainty score0.462

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it