MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2475013403

Un modelo epistemológico de referencia del álgebra como instrumento de modelización

2011· article· es· W2475013403 on OpenAlexaff
Noemí Ruiz Munzón, Marianna Bosch, Josep Gascón

Bibliographic record

VenueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja) · 2011
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducational theories and practices
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyComputer sciencePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of this work is to coordinate and complete the papers we presented at the first two conferences on the ATD. We propose a reference epistemRORJLFDOPRGHOWKDWLV�≥JOREDO¥�HQRXJKWRSURYLGHDEDVLVIRUW KHVFKRRO� genesis of algebra as a modelling tool and to support a progressive development of the algebraisation process of school mathematics leading to functional modelling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.014
Scholarly communication0.0130.018
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)Same topicEducational theories and practicesFrench-language works237,207