Investigação da Qualidade de Vida e Felicidade na Perspectiva da Psicologia Positiva
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Estudo qualitativo do imaginário do estado de felicidade e qualidade de vida desenvolvido no município de Vassouras-RJ, na perspectiva da Psicologia Positiva. Envolveu 40 participantes, sendo 20 jovens professoras e 20 pessoas acima de 50 anos. Os instrumentos utilizados para a coleta de dados foram: questionário de Dados Pessoais, Escala SWB, Escala PANAS, Escala SLS e Questionário de Auto-avaliação do Bem-estar Pessoal. Os resultados indicaram que: os participantes se perceberam felizes; a possibilidade de acesso aos bens materiais foi vista como condição primordial na obtenção de qualidade de vida e felicidade; os aspectos objetivos (recursos materiais) preponderaram sobre os aspectos subjetivos (aspectos psicológicos); a percepção da qualidade de vida ultrapassou o simples poder aquisitivo, abrangendo a compreensão de bem-estar; e os aspectos objetivos da qualidade dos serviços de que a população dispõe apareceram aliados aos aspectos subjetivos do seu bem-estar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.017 | 0.020 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".