MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2475133691

Applying artificial potential fields to path planning for mobile robotics and to haptic rendering for minimally invasive surgery

2005· article· en· W2475133691 on OpenAlexaff
Jing Ren

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRoboticsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceMotion planningRobotRendering (computer graphics)Haptic technologyControl reconfigurationEmbedded system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Artificial Potential Fields (APFs) are widely used in many areas of robotics, mainly due to their simplicity and computational efficiency, but they suffer from several inherent limitations and have many unresolved issues. The oscillation problem greatly limits the use of APFs for high speed mobile robots. In this thesis, we introduce Modified Newton's Method (MNM) into APFs and show that the oscillation problem can be eliminated or greatly reduced by using this technique. Another difficulty in applying APFs is the lack of a potential model that can accurately represent an arbitrary shape. Most of the existing potential models restrict the shape of objects to some particular geometries, which limits the application of the proposed method and can obstruct the goal or the path to the goal. This drawback becomes more pronounced when we apply APFs to haptic rendering for minimally invasive surgery. In this thesis, we propose a new potential model based on generalized sigmoid functions that can accurately represent a large class of shapes. New difficulties arise when we apply APFs to multi-robot path planning. One major challenge is to bridge the high-level task planning and the low-level path planning and integrate them into one framework. In this thesis, we propose a framework for a cooperative multi-robot team. By combining an intelligent agent architecture, a potential field-based hybrid navigation scheme and a built-in reconfiguration mechanism into one framework, the proposed architecture allows a robot team to allocate tasks among team members independent of human supervision and to accomplish a wide range of navigation tasks. Finally, we present a geometric transformation-based algorithm for avoiding moving obstacles. Our approach has low computational cost and is guaranteed to find the optimal solution if it exists. Algorithms are validated through simulation and experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score0.837

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207