Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le site Mudrick, situe dans la foret-parc de trembles, dans le centre nord de la Saskatchewan, avait fait l'objet d'un ramassage de surface par Thomas Smith et Victor Vigrass dans les annees 1950 et 1960. Ils y avaient recueilli des centaines de tessons, ainsi que des pointes de fleches, des grattoirs, des couteaux bifaces et deux herminettes de pierre polie. La majorite des 18 recipients representes par les tessons appartiennent au type de ceramique a decor d'impression de textile de Winnipeg, caracteristique des assemblages Selkirk. Les elements Selkirk sont frequents dans les forets du nord, mais plus rares dans les zones boisees de la Saskatchewan. Le deplacement vers le sud des peuples adaptes a la foret semble avoir ete facilite par des relations sociales et politiques amicales avec les habitants des plaines, comme l'indique la presence de poterie de type Wascana et Mortlach, ainsi que du materiel lithique meridional dans l'assemblage Mudrick. Ce mouvement vers le sud, a l'epoque Selkirk (entre 1300 et 1700) semble prefigurer l'expansion dans les plaines des peuples de la foret (les Cris) au cours de la periode suivante, celle de la traite des fourrures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".