Pope and Talbot Inc. <i>v.</i> Government of Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Arbitration — North American Free Trade Agreement, Chapter 11 — UNCITRAL arbitration — Jurisdiction — Investment disputes — Definition — Whether measure relating to trade in goods capable of being measure relating to an investment — Procedural requirements for bringing claim — Waiver of right to institute or continue national proceedings — Whether going to jurisdiction Arbitration — North American Free Trade Agreement, Chapter 11 — UNCITRAL arbitration — Procedure and evidence — Claim of Crown privilege — Whether available before UNCITRAL arbitral tribunal — Whether State required to identify documents and produce reasoned submissions regarding their confidentiality — Whether UNCITRAL Tribunal empowered to compel production of documents — Scope of solicitor-client privilege — Claim — Amendment to claim Economics, trade and finance — North American Free Trade Agreement — Aims and objectives — Interpretation — Relationship with general international law — Requirement of national treatment — Minimum standard of treatment — Performance requirements Expropriation — Definition — North American Free Trade Agreement, Article 1110 — Measures tantamount to expropriation — Meaning — Whether extending beyond concept 294 of expropriation in general international law — Creeping expropriation International tribunals — Arbitration tribunal — UNCITRAL — North American Free Trade Agreement, Chapter 11 — Jurisdiction and powers — Procedure and evidence State responsibility — Treatment of aliens — Investor protection — North American Free Trade Agreement, Chapter 11 — National treatment — Meaning of “like circumstances” — Minimum standard of treatment — Fair and equitable treatment — Full protection and security — Use of terms in bilateral investment treaties — Expropriation Treaties — Interpretation — Principles of interpretation — Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 1969, Articles 31 to 33 — Application to North American Free Trade Agreement
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".