A Simple Parameter Estimation Approach to Modeling of Photovoltaic Modules Based on Datasheet Values
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This work presents a simple parameter estimation approach for a photovoltaic (PV) module using a single-diode five-parameter electrical model. The proposed approach only uses the information from manufacturer datasheet without requiring a specific experimental procedure or a curve extractor. The number of parameters to be determined is first reduced from five to two by gaining insight into electrical equations of the model at the standard test conditions (STCs). A nonlinear least square (NLS) objective function is then constructed and minimized by a complete scan for all possible values of the two parameters within some specific ranges based on their physical meaning. Consequently, the single-diode five-parameter electrical model at the STC is determined based on two optimal parameter values. Besides, a PV full characteristic model with consideration of both the irradiance and temperature dependencies is also constructed by using the data at the nominal operating cell temperature (NOCT) test conditions. The proposed approach is easy to implement and free of the convergence problem. The evaluations on several PV modules show that the proposed approach is capable of extracting accurate estimates of the model parameters.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".